(→Alpert scapegoat edit: new section) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I looked in the edit history and it looks like Alpert added this himself? |
I looked in the edit history and it looks like Alpert added this himself? |
||
[[Special:Contributions/100.15.128.218|100.15.128.218]] 10:50, October 15, 2019 (UTC) |
[[Special:Contributions/100.15.128.218|100.15.128.218]] 10:50, October 15, 2019 (UTC) |
||
+ | :Thanks, I have removed that line. <span style="background:blue; padding:6px 3px; font-size:smaller; border-radius:15px;"><span style="background:black; color:white; padding:3px; padding-left:5px; border-radius:15px 0 0 15px; white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Bobogoobo|{{color|yellow|'''Bobogoobo'''}}]] {{!}} [[User talk:Bobogoobo|{{color|orange|Talk}}]] {{!}} [[Bobogoobo|{{color|green|Nation}}]]</span> <span style="background:black; color:white; padding:3px; padding-right:5px; border-radius:0 15px 15px 0; white-space:nowrap;">11:57, Tuesday, 15 October 2019 ({{wikipedia|Eastern Time Zone|ET|color=#FFF}})</span></span>  |
Latest revision as of 15:57, 15 October 2019
\m/ rules
- "wrongly banned", "\m/ rules"... thus the info box at the top disputing
- I agree. "Wrongly" banned is not describing a fact, but expressing an opinion about a fact. I don't see why that adjective should stay in the article, it's completely not-NPOV.
- Anyway, being me CN-wiki-nub, out of respect for older contributors, I won't change it on my own. Jerdge 14:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. "Wrongly" banned is not describing a fact, but expressing an opinion about a fact. I don't see why that adjective should stay in the article, it's completely not-NPOV.
Alpert scapegoat edit[]
I was reading Cyber Nations history, and it felt off to me that the bottom of this page has:
"It turns out Alpert was innocent, but rather a scapegoat in this process. He was later forgiven."
I looked in the edit history and it looks like Alpert added this himself? 100.15.128.218 10:50, October 15, 2019 (UTC)