this article is extremely biased and should be rewritten.
also shouldn't there be an picture for the INC?
I agree with the above post. The position of first person writing also does not help it at all.
Whether you agree or not is none of GATO's or mine, the articles author, concern. It is clearly stated at the top of the article it is disputed as bias. INC has no picture because there is no such thing. The article will not be changed. --Depraved 03:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Article rewritten because it is biased. Being neutral myself, I was able to rewrite the article from a Neutral point of view. No unprotected article, especially one that is labeled biased and discussing an event between multiple conflicting parties will ever be said to be unable being changed. -- Mason11987 (T - C - E -CN) 15:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me but no. You aren't going to rewrite anything, no matter how biased you claim the article to be. You cannot rewrite an article about a situation you were not there for, nor can you have any grounds to rewrite an article you consider biased with all of the EXTREMELY BIASED articles you have on this Wiki. Give me a break. The original article will stand or this article will be marked for deletion.
- Feel free to mark it if you like, but neither an article that is biased nor an article that is edited by someone besides you are grounds for deletion, so it will not be deleted. If other articles are biased, then those can be discussed on their individual grounds, and just so you know, blanket biased template bombing will not be appreciated. I will edit this article because "all contributions to Cyber Nations Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors, and are released under the GNU Free Doc License" meaning you, nor the original, nor either party, nor both parties "owns" the article. It IS biased, and I will edit it, because it is in first person, and should not be. That alone is reason enough. Everyone has a right to edit articles so that they are as factually correct and as close to a NPOV as possible, that is what a wiki is, and this is a wiki. -- Mason11987 (T - C - E -CN) 20:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Also, there are but a few people that examine more then the threads they write here, so if you want to point out some articles we should focus our attention on, feel free to, this one had comments on the talk page calling for change because of the bias, then you saying this article won't be changed as if you owned the article, which, by posting it here, you do not. -- Mason11987 (T - C - E -CN) 20:42, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
...[]
This is some literary trash here" first person and biased to boot? Jesus.