Nice one DW.<sarcasm> The article was already unbiased enough. Adding more comments from BAM! supporters and nothing from BAM! criticizers completely skews the article completely to BAM! side. Where are the comments from the TPF members that have been saying they regret making your alliance a protectorate, which there is only one line of that in this article when it probably deserves more coverage. All sides were already represented equally. I generalized criticism from both sides briefly, but I can see where there can be another edit, so I'll if I can fairly make the necessary changes, unlike what you did.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.