FANDOM



For any previous votes please check our Archives.
For the present pending articles please vote below:

As previously decided, all articles below will be discussed and voted on to see which will remian as featured articles.


Votes for the articles listedEdit

SyrinxiaEdit

Almost There are a few formatting problems. I am going to see if I can work them out. Once these are fixed. I will change this. J Andres 14:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes A lengthy, detailed, mostly well-written article... this is, I think, as good as it gets on this wiki. -- Alphacow talk 02:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Yes I have just overhauled the intro and I will keep re-transforming the article to make it look more like a real country's than a CyberNation. --Geddy 05:45, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Geddy LeeEdit

Yes Informative J Andres 14:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes Some issues in the text with informal use of language, but overall very detailed and very good. -- Alphacow talk 02:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

XánténiaEdit

Not Yet I understand that much of this is a work in progress, but I don't believe this is quite up the the standards of a Great Text just yet. J Andres 14:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
No needs some more work on the text, as well as formatting issues... add more section markers, delineate sub-sections better. -- Alphacow talk 02:48, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Red BrigadeEdit

Yes This on the other hand is a fully developed article. J Andres 14:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
No This is almost a great article, but my only beef is that it's written too much in newspaper style - many of the paragraphs, especially at the end, are just two or three sentences long. This is an encyclopedia... flesh things out! -- Alphacow talk 02:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Yes It could be cleaned up a bit, and I would like to know where they got their navy from, but I give it a yes. The article seems on par with those that are already great articles and has great content.-- Sancus 19:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

J AndresEdit

Abstain I am finally submitting my main page for review and consideration. I'm not voting for obvious reasons. If you don't think its up to par, thats all right. J Andres 17:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Yes, pending revisions I like it, but I have a few suggestions:
  • Don't use the = = tag. It's too visually similar to the == == tag. I suggest you simply make the = =-level into == ==, the == == into === ===, etc.
  • enlarge the subsections with only a few sentences, or find a way to combine them into one larger section.
Other than that, its quite good. Those are my comments for which I would withhold a solid yes. Other suggestions you may feel free to implement at leisure (or not, whatever) are:
  • anywhere where you have a Main article: (link), you should indent it with an ":".
  • remove the "government officials" subsection; that information should go in a text box at the top.
  • some small textual stuff that a proofread with probably catch
I hope that's useful in developing the article! Have a good one - Alphacow talk 03:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

GroßgermaniaEdit

Yes Detailed, informative, with excellent content. Rishnokof 02:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes - Your nation's article is one of the best articles about a nation in the entire CN Wiki. — Pikachurin - (Talk) (Contribs) 18:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

DisparuEdit

Post here. I will be neutral in this vote. — Pikachurin - (Talk) (Contribs) 19:44, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

  • I'm unsure as to whether non-administrators are allowed to vote, but if we are, yes. Not only is it well-written, but it has been the source of some awesome pictures! ~ Michael von Preußen (voicemail) • (nation)

Grand BesaidEdit

Clearly enough content, and well-written. The one thing I'd suggest is clearing up the redlinks. Michael von Preußen  voicemail • nation  @ 6:25, Octidi, 18 Pluviôse CCXVIII

Why didn't I see this before? <_< Anyways, I support this. The article itself has a lot of content, appropriate images and follows the Manual of Style, plus it's supported by a number of other good articles.  Pikachurin   Talk • Contribs   21:29, Monday, 26 April 2010 (ET)

NominationsEdit

Hello! Edit

Check out Syrinxia, Geddy Lee, or check out "Category:Syrinxia" for that matter.

I will look more indepth at these articles in the coming week to appropriately assess them. J Andres 01:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


Meh Edit

Hey, thought maybe my nation (Xánténia) may have a chance. If not then maybe my nation's Red Brigade, I'm also working on other pages, especially my capital city, and some other minor towns/cities.

I will look more indepth at these articles in the coming week to appropriately assess them. J Andres 01:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Cheers, -Palachinov

 -Cheers man ;)

Transvaal Edit

I would like to nominate my nation page for Transvaal Botha 22:43 February 5, 2008

Nordreich Edit

Nominating Nordreich to be considered as a "great article". Vinzent Zeppelin (talk) 16:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Marshdonia Edit

I'd like to nominate Marshdonia - my nation page. Marshdonia 02:54, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Clinkham WoodEdit

Nominating Clinkham Wood- my nation page, to become a great article. Gav235 19:25 13 December 2008 (GMT)

GroßgermaniaEdit

I wish to nominate my nation's article, Großgermania, to be included as a Featured Article. My nation's page, while still being improved, is detailed and has significant history and information regarding my nation's history. Making an empty section for a vote above. ~ Michael von Preußen (voicemail) • (nation)

DisparuEdit

I'd like to nominate my nation's article, Disparu, to be considered as one of CN Wiki's Featured Articles.

Pikachurin - (Talk) (Contribs) 18:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Grand BesaidEdit

I would like to nominate my nation's article, Grand Besaid, to be considered as a featured article on the CN Wiki.

 Dynasty1   Talk • Grand Besaid    10:03, 6 February 2010 (EST)

United States of JBREdit

I would like to nominate my nation's article, United States of JBR to be considered as a featured article of the Cyber Nations Wiki as suggested by administrator, Bobogoobo. JUSTIN VUONG:User|Talk|Nation 01:36, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Question Edit

Should there be any attempt to stop people from adding their nation to this category on a whim without being nominated and discussed (such as Elanthia) or is it enough that it is shown here which nations have been "authorized" to be here? ~ Bobogoobo [Talk | Nation] 19:36, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.