Good alliance page nominations

This process is just meant to identify good alliance pages (example: link TBD) from bad alliance pages (example: United Global Order). There's no defined close out period at the moment for nominations.

Nomination Format

===[[Article name/link]]===
*'''Nomination''' - Reason(s) for why you are nominating the article - sign your name (type "~~~~")

Voting/Commenting on a nomination

::'''Support/Oppose/Comment/Abstain''' - Reason(s) for why you are in support/opposition etc to the nomination (although reason(s) are not mandatory). - sign your name (type "~~~~")


New Pacific Order

  • Nomination - Very in depth alliance article including alliance structure, culture, government, brief history with founding, treaties and gallery. additional links to charter, history, gov history.   Rogal  talk   03:44,9/11/2012 (UTC)
Abstain - In general, I feel the page is well within the necessary requirements content-wise for this distinction. However, I think some of the formatting could definitely be improved to make the article as a whole more æsthetically pleasing. It's also my personal opinion that things like the news template present in the introduction, which are not encyclopædic in nature, would be better suited to inclusion in a relevant portal than the article.   Michael von Preußen | talk

The Legion

  • Nomination - Good description of the alliance as a whole (structure, government, war history/ribbons, history, treaties) and aesthetically pleasing from colored templates usage on the page. With links to charter, history, gov history. The departments could use a bit of an expansion is the only thing I'd say that would need to be worked on.   Rogal  talk   03:44,9/11/2012 (UTC)
Oppose - My issues with the Legion's page are somewhat opposite my thoughts on Pacifica's; specifically, while I find the article well-formatted, I'm not certain it contains enough content. Specifically, while information on history and admissions is well fleshed-out, I agree with Rogal's thoughts on the government departments, and furthermore think it definitely needs a more substantial introduction.   Michael von Preußen | talk

The Imperial Order

  • Nomination - Great in-depth history, government, treaties, war history, image gallery. Additional links to charter, awards, gov history, TIO announcements.   Rogal  talk   03:44,9/11/2012 (UTC)
Support per nom.   Michael von Preußen | talk


  • Nomination - Very in-depth history, government, alliance structure/departments, good use of templates, alliance treaties. Additional links to war history, charter, government history.   Rogal  talk   03:44,9/11/2012 (UTC)
Tentative Support - As a former alliance, I think the article should be reformatted to use past tense consistently when referring to the alliance.   Michael von Preußen | talk

Mostly Harmless Alliance

  • Nomination - Good description of alliance structure, culture, government, war history/ribbons, and international relations. good use of thumbnail images throughout article. brief summaries of history/charter/government positions with additional links to all.   Rogal  talk   03:44,9/11/2012 (UTC)
Support per nom. Article does an excellent job of providing all relevant information without being unnecessarily verbose. Images are also used extremely well.   Michael von Preußen | talk

New Polar Order

  • Nomination - alliance charter, good alliance history, war history/ribbons, image gallery, international relations, alliance structure/departments as well as department head history and good use of dept images/templates throughout the article. Only slight against it would be a rather small / not-up-to-date alliance history section compared to the alliance's life   Rogal  talk   03:44,9/11/2012 (UTC)
Tentative Support, providing the alliance history could be updated as Rogal suggested.   Michael von Preußen | talk
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.