User talk:J Andres/Archive1

October Massacre
200 nations versus 12? Thats not counting alliances other than nordreich that were involved, thats a massacre, there was no war, just a trouncing by imperialists. With the addition of NADC and TTF the only more appropriate word would be genocide, as that targeted our peacefully jewish nations particuarly harshly. The openly jewish nation who had never attacked anyong,George Sears lost all but 20 infra, the nation Reich Zealand continued attacking George Sears nation for more that 48 hours after the official announcement by the SoL that they had dissolved, and Nordreich's official declaration of Peace, George Sears was also attacked thoughout the entire ceasefire with no break.

God knows how many people were against the Poor SoL. Who was by no means a rogue alliance, they had one guy that was truly rogue and thats it. Another guy labeled himself SoL but was never officially accpeted. Nordreich simply carried out some outrageous expansionist campaign. I found out they have been targeting small alliances for months! Most of them were disbanded without any official announcemnets. A jewish alliance was totally destroyed by Nordreich. They also came to the aid of "The 4th Reich" a nation whos ruler is labeled "racially aware" and his description is constantly changing but it almost always anti-semitic and anti-leftist


 * See the October Massacre Talk Page for most of this discussion


 * I have added the opposite point of view into the article. J Andres 19:30, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

=Adminship=

Hello i see that you are working a lot on this Wikia i will add something to it more or less like semi-admins. That would be you User:Stefanmg and me. Then we should work as fictional admins on this wikia until we get status of real admin. Do you agree Stefan said yes. Whisperer 17:48, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Sure. J Andres 17:50, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Why did you that to honor user template? I am still working on ti and i just lost everything. Well seems i'll have to do it once more. Whisperer 18:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC).


 * Thought you were through. I am done with what I was doing. You always could revert. J Andres 18:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Well just frame it and in the box delete there is probably one more then needed and its ok and add this to your user page its OK. It looks like profesional job to my amater templates. Whisperer 18:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I like the idea of the Wiki Guardian :) Whisperer 20:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Well this user aido wanted to become wikia guardian. We should give him chance and leave him to edit few more days and as a reward he should become wiki guardian. Do you agree? Whisperer 09:25, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

It figures, once I SoL agrees on the page NoR goes in and screws with it.

Nordreich
Sir, did you actually read the edit that was made? The first paragraph alot of first person speech. Followed by refutations of the original data. Whoever edited that is obviously not aware that debate for changes in an article belongs in the talk page.

Aren't you some kind of admin? I thought you would know the rules for the wiki.


 * I am not an official admin. I am one of three self appointed admins, "Guardians" so to speak. The reason I undid you edit is you page blanked the charter and other things that belong on the page, instead of just that paragraph. I do believe that paragraph should go. J Andres 19:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Nordreich editions
I am a leader of Nordreich and have not exactly followed all the complications involved with our wiki page. I find it somewhat annoying that our own approved version of the wiki continually gets replaced by a slanderous one written by some who stand ideologically opposed to us. I think it's vandalism. I request that my revised version be allowed to stay in place without being reverted. It would be appreciated.
 * Greetings Nordreich Member! Thank you for taking this to a talk page before just editing. First off, edit the bottom section of your article the way you want. SoL has no problems with that section and it needs some cleaning. Then in a separate edit fix the first section and we will have to come up with a new consensus. J Andres 11:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Admin status
Congratulation on your new status. Well we should be able to control those vandals they are already blocked. Whisperer 19:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you and congratulations as well. J Andres 19:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Expansion v. Stub
Hello Andres do you agree with action of aido to redirect expansion template to the stub template, as far as i am informed both of them exist on wikipedia and are used in different situations. What is your oppinion. Whisperer 13:22, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Stub is more for an extremly short article whereas expansion is for longer ones. stubs also have subcategories. J Andres 18:22, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, OK i understand that and i agree my logict behind was the same as yours. That's why i protected it so it wont be redirected anymore to the stub. I think also that we need both of them. Whisperer 10:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

You should apply for bureaucratship
I think you should apply to be a bureaucrat. I would vote for you, you are an extremely important member here. Aido2002 03:32, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Cybernations:Protection
I'd like to hear your thoughts on this proposed policy, thanks. Mason11987 18:58, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I like the policy. If this is also meant to ask me what my beliefs about /b/ vs \b\, I do support Aido's decision about temporarily semi-protecting. J Andres 19:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It is also meant to ask you your thoughts about it, since the policy (as it was copied here, and as it is at wikipedia) makes something like that (unwarranted protection without discussion) a thing that's frowned upon. Mason11987 19:51, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It has been reverted back quite a few times and Aido did talk about it on its talk page. J Andres 19:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Bureaucrat
Congratulations, you are now a bureaucrat. Enjoy your new powers, use them wisely. Aido2002 20:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Whoa...
Why are bannings on the wiki having anything to do with natinos getting attacked in CN? You unbanned him because that was your agreement for him to top attacking you? If people vandalize the wiki, then they are banned, and we shouldn't have to allow vandalism for fear of getting attacked in CN and reading your Wars by J Andres page it seems like that's what happened. -- Mason11987 (T - C - E - CN ) 20:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I unbanned him because policy stated he should have got 1 day of banning, but I hadn't read the policy at that point. I told him that I would remove the ban (because he already served the sentence he deserved) if he ceased attacks. J Andres 20:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * If he was supposed to get 1 day, he should have been unblocked regardless of CN, if he was supposed to get more then 1 day he shouldn't have been unblocked, regardless of CN. It now seems like you were threatening to hold a ban longer then it should have been because he attacked you in CN which seems like you are using your powers here to have power in CN and that doesn't seem right to me. -- Mason11987 (T - C - E - CN ) 20:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Taking a matter from thw wiki into the actual game isn't right either. He ended up getting banned for having multiple accounts. He was in the wrong for bringing that issue into the game instead of discussing it on the talk page. Just for doing something like that, he probably should have recieved more days. In fact we should have something in the policy for that. "Bringing Wiki issues into the game without discussion." J Andres 20:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Two wrongs don't make a right ;). I get what you're saying though, either way. -- Mason11987 (T - C - E - CN ) 21:35, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Your TE Nation
You said on the Pump that you wrote an article on your TE nation. Put it on the category Category:Cyber Nations Tournament Edition, I am going to work on subcats in that cat (If you can...I hope so) This way, we can seperate all the TE artilce in one cat, making it easy to keep them apart, and find a TE article. Aido2002 23:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I will make an article, but haven't gotten around to it yet. J Andres 03:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)