User talk:Lol pie

Guard Template
I have to say, I really like the template. Good work! J Andres 13:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Just saw the RIA template. Once again I am extremely impressed and I will probably adapt a version for the NADC to use at some point. Terrfic Work. Keep it up. You are a valuable member of the wiki community. 70.172.217.203 02:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * About half an hour ago I was thinking about making a BLEU template. I'm glad I didn't since you ended up making one. Terrific work once again! J Andres 17:17, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

RPA Talk moved to TUPA Talk
I see you moved the RPA Talk to the TUPA Talk. I had purposedly left it where it was, thinking that it addressed things that were by far outdated, thus being of not much use for the new page. Now I'm uncertain. I would thank you if you explained why you moved the Talk page along with the main one. And, would it fit to revert your change and put a link to the "old" Talk in the TUPA "new" talk? Jerdge 12:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * That choice of yours is perfect, congrats. Now you may delete/archive this section of your talk, if you wish (well, it's your talk anyway ;-)). Jerdge 16:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC).

Hey there

 * Noticed that you removed The Orange Unity Treaty from the news page. Why is that.
 * Also, the OUT template is not "The Citrus Accords" That is the name of the ODN Charter.
 * I also loved your format for all of the other alliance blocs which is why I used it in the creation of the OUT's. You should feel honored that your template has become universal. If I did somthing different it would not look right. True that you came up with the general format, but someone came up with the general infobox format too. Don't get too sore over it! :) I think that you would like people to use your format over others. -User:Franklin2
 * The Reason it is under The Orange Unity Treaty is because everyone in the treaty calls it that or OUT

admin?
Are you interested in becoming an admin here. It would give you permissions to block/ban and roll back etc. You are a very active user of the CN Wiki as of late and I think we could benefit from having you on the team. If you are interested, I can start a vote (in which I will likely be the only person to vote) but you would make it anyway. J Andres 18:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It is done. Welcome to the family! J Andres 22:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to the admin team!
Hey... welcome to the team! As a warm gesture, please accept these delicious cookies. (At this point, pretend I just gave you some cookies for the full effect.) I just wanted to ask you to add a few pages to your watch list to make sure you don't miss out on the full Admin effect. Those pages are: Again, thanks for helping out! I'll be around less and less, but if you need votes for something or an outside opinion on something feel free to send me an email. Cheers - Alphacow talk 17:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Main Page - watch this one in case someone posts to the Main Page talk page
 * Community Portal - this one is optional, as the portal is effectively dead
 * Report vandalism
 * Requests for adminship
 * Village Pump
 * Cyber_Nations_Wiki:Village_Pump
 * Help page - watch this one in case people post on the help talk page

Thankyou
Thankyou on behalf of us all for your wonderful templates! Esus 19:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Continuum template
Hey,

I saw you edited the width of the template. Don't you think it's ugly when you don't width it longer (like it was width:94%? Because imo it is uglier when you don't do that... I wanted to change it now but first I wanted to ask if you had any specific reasons of removing that width? I guess that you disagree with me about the question if you leave width out that it isn't ugly then? I wait for your answer. -Wouser 08:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Second VietFAN
Read the dates on the declaration posts. The times on the forum posts coincide with the 6am times.JTBeowulf 21:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * My bad, you're right. I would have never caught that if you hadn't pointed it out. Sorry about this. JTBeowulf 23:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey
Can we get this page protected please? FOK!-Alliance --Hayastan 01:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Again
Thanks for all your work, including on categorisation. Esus 08:28, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

131.183.18.76
131.183.18.76 made a few edits putting your name in the comments as if he was you: http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/131.183.18.76

I commented on it on his talk page for you to check into in case you weren't him. If you were, why tag those articles with delete? -- Mason11987 (T - C - E) 19:40, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Spelling
In regards to your 'correcting' of the spelling in the Five Days that Shook the World article, what you actually did was change all of the spelling to the Americanised version -- removed the letter 'u', changed the letter 's' to the letter 'z' etc. While I appreciate your 'wikifying' of the article, I would remind you that not everyone is from America. This does not make their spelling incorrect.

adminship
May I ask how the admins are assigned/made on this wiki and the required credentials.

Rishnokof 20:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey!
So...whatchya doin' on IRON's wiki page? :)

I saw you'd editted something, but I can't quite tell what it was.

Coursca 04:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! :D
Oh...thanks! :)

Appreciate it!

Coursca 04:44, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank You
I wanted to thank you for the small amount of help you gave me in my article. It is much more clean than before, and I appreciate it. The Reclaimer 22:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
I posted a application there. Also great job with all your effort in making templates and articles. Rishnokof 05:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

response
when can i expect a response? Rishnokof 04:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Ossetia; category
Just a little note to thank you for your work re the categorical changes of every file and page relating to my country. Thank you! Just take my fanatical obsession with writing the history of the monarchy and country bit by bit as just that... fanatical and just a little obsessive! ;)

Thanks
Thanks for adding the catogary to my pages. King dope 01:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Bump
Hey, if you have any questions for me about the adminship please feel free to ask.

Deletion, how?
LolPie, yet again I feel the need to thank you for all your hardwork.

On a 'work related' note, what is the process for proposing deletion to an article? Rather than use the delete tag for speedy, this nomination requires discussion.

Thanks, Esus 08:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Request for comment
Greetings. If you don't mind I'd like to request your thoughts on my submission for Nordreich to be considered a "great article". &diams; Vinzent Zeppelin (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Reminder
Well its been a month and you requested I remind you about the adminship request, I beleive I have been active and contributing regularly. And am looking forward to you're decision. Rishnokof 06:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Snappy Update
Good job getting the Lol, Maroonity and SPAM articles/boxes put in so dang quick.

--Xiphos 00:42, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Why edit our No Vision from the 1V-GATO war? That's what they are calling themselves.

Thank you
I'd just like to thank you for all the work and effort you've put into this Wiki. The templates, pages you've created and articles you've edited have no doubt helped many (including me).

Keep up the good work.

Small Force 08:50, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for taking action against user 74.236.191.68. -- Sancus 00:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Important Info Template
The Important Info box on the main page reads:


 * A new vandalism policy has been instated. Please familiarize yourself with the policy, and help us police it by reporting all vandalism.

That's been up for several months. Can I propose it be reworded thus:


 * New users please familiarize yourself with the vandalism policy, and help us police it by reporting all vandalism.

Thanks for being a great Admin!

Thanks
Wow... you're good. Thanks for adding my nation's category to the language page.

Thanks for the redirect on Principles of Pacifica!

Main Page
Perhaps I'm the only one who has the problem, but the main page is really screwed up. Dunno what's wrong with it. Thought you could fix it.

In case you can't see the problem, and it's entirely my computer's fault, here's a screenshot:

Screenshot

-

Looks the same as ^^^^ to me, except I see an advertisement in the white space. So I would assume someone changed the code to make it look like that.

Zikawe 02:27, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

CN Wiki IRC
perhaps we could make an irc channel, where users could to discuss things about the wiki. Rishnokof 09:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Fascism
I created a template, Template:fascists, which has proved most unuseful since Rishnokof keeps removing it from pages I put it on that are even in Category:fascism. Delete it, please.

Broken Link in protected template
Could you please edit Template:AInfo to have the following code? There's a broken link and I've fixed the problem. You may want to even consider unblocking it, as I doubt it's possible for it to be a target of much vandalism. Thanks. General Mazur 02:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Problems
It is impossible to edit the articles /b/ or \m/. The SPAM filter blocks you from editing those pages altogether, as it says it is SPAM. Please do something :) General Mazur 02:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

hey
hey lol pie i have a few things i want to talk to you about, could you please message me on my talk page.

Rishnokof 09:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Two Bugs
Hey Lol pie.

I came accross a bug when I was doing my usual updates of the Viridian Entente's page. On the Reformed page at the end of International Relations it doesn't recognize my tag, though it does recognize the tag I put at the beginning of the section.

Also, I tried to make a report about it, but it just showd me "no report matches your request" or something like that. Werid.

Anywho, just drop my talk a line.

-Smooth

Request for Adminship
Just want to let you know that I have applied for adminship here.

Any feedback would be appreciated.

General Mazur 01:09, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Red Alliances
As I noted on the discussion page (noting here since you seem to have missed it), GATO has never been a red alliance. Soviestan 18:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Bit of an issue...
Not a big deal, but perhaps you'd be interested in looking at Template talk:Francoism.

General Mazur 23:31, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

New Header
I see you had edited the new header slightly, to put the old CN Online/Offline and Login boxes back in. Personally, I thought it looked better without those boxes, and so I re-removed them and edited the image to put the online/offline status in the image itself, replacing the login and register links at the bottom. I hope it is satisfactory.

Should you have any more ideas, please let me know.

Thanks, General Mazur 04:26, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Requesting Ban
The anonymous user 72.196.27.210 has been vandalising a lot of pages. I request a ban.

Admin-edit request
Hi there!

I'm attempting to set up a template that will allow for the creation of personal-looking boxes included at the top of pages by inserting a user's name into a box (ie, create a message that says ", please clean up this article."

I have the template code made, but I need two admin-access only pages edited, and am wondering if you would be so kind as to do it for me.

I need the following added to MediaWiki:Common.js:

/** Username replace function (template:USERNAME) ******************************* * Inserts user name into * By Splarka */ addOnloadHook(UserNameReplace); function UserNameReplace { if(typeof(disableUsernameReplace) != 'undefined' && disableUsernameReplace) return; for(var i=0; UserName = document.getElementsByTagName("span")[i]; i++) { if ((document.getElementById('pt-userpage'))&&(UserName.getAttribute('id') == "insertusername")) { UserName.innerHTML = wgUserName; }  } } // getElementsByClass - http://www.dustindiaz.com/getelementsbyclass/ function getElementsByClass(searchClass,node,tag) { var classElements = new Array; if ( node == null ) node = document; if ( tag == null ) tag = '*'; var els = node.getElementsByTagName(tag); var elsLen = els.length; var pattern = new RegExp("(^|\\s)"+searchClass+"(\\s|$)"); for (i = 0, j = 0; i < elsLen; i++) { if ( pattern.test(els[i].className) ) { classElements[j] = els[i]; j++; }	}	return classElements; }

That should do it. It would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, General Mazur 08:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Did you know...
That you are incredebly awesome? I just noticed that I had a page made when I was elected HOMO for the RIA, and that you created it.

Thus, you are AWESOME!!!

Problem reports
I'm sorry I cannot write this in Finnish.

Hi there, did you have some open problem reports? You can view them at Special:ProblemReports. Its a great system for users to mark pages with various types of problems to bring them to the attention of admins. Often they are about the subject of the wiki, and only someone from the wiki can make the knowledgeable decision on how to fix the page.

Its a fairly simple system to use. You can click the magnify glass icon to show the reported problem for each ticket. The icons on the right change the status of the report. The green check mark icon is for "Fixed", you use this if you read the report, and changed something on the page to fix the reported problem, (or deleted it, if its a vandal/spam report), or anything that "Fixes" the problem. The red X icon is for "closed", this is for reports that are false/jokes, or things that are not really a problem. The yellow triangle will mark a report for need help by Wikia Staff, it is used when there is something wrong with the wiki that you cannot fix here with editing pages, such as menus not working, or skin problems, or anything beyond your control. Use it sparingly, as there are many wikis, and our time is limited, but dont be afraid to use it either, we dont want you to have a broken wiki for too long. The last icon is for returning a report back to an open or 'Pending' state if you accidentally used one of the first 3 icons.

If you are using the Monaco skin, there is a ProblemReport widget you can add to your sidebar, so you can see as soon as problems are reported. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask on my talk page, I'll be glad to help you help your wiki.

--Uberfuzzy 19:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

USN Flag
Just wondering why you reverted the USN flag to their old one. Please let me know on my talk page. Thanks, MvP Michael von Preußen

Military Command of the New Pacific Order
My I ask why you've allowed a wiki member to remove several clearly stated and understood facts about one war under the Military Command page?

These were definitive, well based and confirmed with a clearly stated source and yet they were removed, and now the page has been barred from access to anyone, with any truth within it removed and altered. User:Jinman 10 January 2009
 * I agree with Jinman here, and furthermore believe that Semi-protection here is against the Protected page guidelines:

When should it not be used? Semi-protection should not be used: * As a response to regular content disputes, since it may restrict some editors and not others (see the protection policy for how to deal with this);

Michael von Preußen 00:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Jinman
Can you please ask/tell/force Jinman to stop vandalising the NPO wiki entries. He is attempting to hide his vandalism behind a rather shoddy veil of 'neutrality' (don't they all), but his veil is so weak that it is forced to use a complete misreading (not even a misinterpretation, I explicitly state the opposite) of one of my [essays | http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/The_Great_Patriotic_War_and_You (presumably under the assumption that no one would read such a tomb to find out) and from there is forced to try and pretend that I am not the author (Vladimir) so that his misreading doesn't fall straight through the floor when I contradict him on it. It has gotten beyond absurd. The articles he is obsessively vandalising include: Francograd, Military Command of the New Pacific Order, and GATO-1V War.

Thank you, Vladimir Soviestan 16:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I object.
 * I have repeatedly pointed out that my alterations are based upon fact and belief supported by evidence and I have given examples of actual vandalism in the past which has apparently been ignored. Furthermore, I have not removed any information from any order page but added to it:
 * In the Francograd page I pointed out that the Lady Pacifica statue had been destroyed and that there had been no word upon any rebuilding efforts, this also contained a link to the page I was referring to and all of the previous information about the Lady Pacifica statue which has been added was left unaltered.
 * In the Military Command of the New Pacific Order, I have added that the InFANtile war is ongoing and that the GATO-1V war is disputed along with reasons as to why it can be viewed as such, these reasons have been changing as I gain more information upon the thread I refer to and the reasons as to why Pacifican players regard the war as being disputed. All other information has not been left unchanged.
 * In the GATO-1V war page all I have done is once again point out how the war can be viewed as being disputed. The result of the war, GATO’s surrender, remains the same and I have left all other information unaltered. I also wish to point out here that the GATO-1V war page is not an NPO entry.
 * My views upon his thread have (as mentioned in the Military Command statement) changed over time, and while some are in conflict with elements of Vladimir’s essay, I am giving my points as to why they are and as to why these elements are subjective to debate. I have also attempted to reason my points with this man but he continues to apparently misunderstand my train of thought along with my reasons and points.
 * I wish to finish by pointing out that I have stated why I believe that he may not be Vladimir, partially due to the lack of solid evidence of this and also several of the actions and wordings of Soviestan’s works.


 * For more information I recommend that you visit these talk pages

yours sincerely, --Jinman 18:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Once again, I must agree with Jinman. Much as I support both the Orders, Jinman's edits are neutral and his arguments make sense. Michael von Preußen 03:39, 16 January 2009 (UTC)