Category talk:Good alliance pages

Good alliance page nominations This process is just meant to identify good alliance pages (example: link TBD) from bad alliance pages (example: United Global Order). There's no defined close out period at the moment for nominations. Nomination Format

Voting/Commenting on a nomination

New Pacific Order

 * Nomination - Very in depth alliance article including alliance structure, culture, government, brief history with founding, treaties and gallery. additional links to charter, history, gov history.   Rogal   talk    03:44,9/11/2012 (UTC)

The Legion

 * Nomination - Good description of the alliance as a whole (structure, government, war history/ribbons, history, treaties) and aesthetically pleasing from colored templates usage on the page. With links to charter, history, gov history. The departments could use a bit of an expansion is the only thing I'd say that would need to be worked on.   Rogal   talk    03:44,9/11/2012 (UTC)

The Imperial Order

 * Nomination - Great in-depth history, government, treaties, war history, image gallery. Additional links to charter, awards, gov history, TIO announcements.   Rogal   talk    03:44,9/11/2012 (UTC)

Valhalla

 * Nomination - Very in-depth history, government, alliance structure/departments, good use of templates, alliance treaties. Additional links to war history, charter, government history.   Rogal   talk    03:44,9/11/2012 (UTC)

Mostly Harmless Alliance

 * Nomination - Good description of alliance structure, culture, government, war history/ribbons, and international relations. good use of thumbnail images throughout article. brief summaries of history/charter/government positions with additional links to all.   Rogal   talk    03:44,9/11/2012 (UTC)

New Polar Order

 * Nomination - alliance charter, good alliance history, war history/ribbons, image gallery, international relations, alliance structure/departments as well as department head history and good use of dept images/templates throughout the article. Only slight against it would be a rather small / not-up-to-date alliance history section compared to the alliance's life   Rogal   talk    03:44,9/11/2012 (UTC)